Key Takeaways:

  • There were just 1,000 particles ambling about on the screen, living in their digital world governed by Newtonian physics.
  • They interacted under the guidance of gravity.
  • Instead of relying on fine-tuning parameters and entropy, the physicists behind the experiment showed that gravity alone could result in us perceiving a certain direction to time.
  • We may see two universes blossoming from the central state in the simulation, but does that mean it’s something that’s happened in the real world?
  • If there exists a mirror world just out of reach from ours, that universe would experience a preference for right-handedness and there would again be a balance to the bigger picture.
  • If there is such a land as the mirrorverse, it could affect our observations of neutron decay by absorbing some of the particles from our world.

The simulation was a simple one. There were just 1,000 particles ambling about on the screen, living in their digital world governed by Newtonian physics. At their highest complexity the particles were spread away from one another as if curiously exploring the boundaries of their artificial landscape, perhaps hoping to find one of its sharp edges. They interacted under the guidance of gravity. Some of the particles would pull together into familiar clusters resembling galaxies or stars. The simulation was a representation of our universe; magnificent and complex celestial bodies were reduced down to just flat, smooth points on a screen. At their lowest complexity the points joined together to form a tightly-packed region not unlike the astoundingly dense state of the early universe.

The most interesting observation came at the moment of the simulation’s Big Bang: the particles were close together in one central crowded point, then they expanded outward along not one but two separate paths. They’d float away, cluster into planet systems and galaxy shapes. The points speckled the screen as a rudimentary but exciting representation of our real world. Except there weren’t two paths in the real world. There was only one…right?

There is talk of opening a “portal” to the mirror world. In recent years experiments like those of Leah Broussard at Oak Ridge National Laboratory attempt to probe the mirror world by sending some of our particles there and back. The experiment involves a beam of particles traveling down a long tunnel that contains a strong magnet. The particles stream past the magnet and towards a thick wall through which none of them should be able to pass. If any of those particles do make it through the wall, then it could mean that they have transformed into their mirror versions and back again. Above is seen a nuclear reactor at Oak Ridge. Image by ORNL.

For the simulation’s Big Bang to have led to two separate paths implied that there had formed two separate universes, each a mirror of the other. The experiment was itself an attempt to better understand time — more specifically, it was an attempt to understand the arrow of time. Why do we experience life as unfolding in one direction and not any other? Events happen and we then create treasured memories of them, we do not first have the memories and then experience the event. The arrow of time is a persistent mystery in physics. None of the most famous laws like relativity or electrodynamics have any preference. They don’t care nor do they dictate in which direction time flows.

Up until now the most popular explanation for this phenomenon has been entropy. Time moves forward because the second law of thermodynamics requires that the universe be constantly in a state of greater and greater disorganization. This disorganization is called entropy. But that’s exactly what this 1,000 point simulation aimed to challenge. Instead of relying on fine-tuning parameters and entropy, the physicists behind the experiment showed that gravity alone could result in us perceiving a certain direction to time.

But it also showed that we aren’t the only observers. Time would be moving backwards on the second path (or what we would perceive as backwards, though to the observers in this universe time would be moving forward). This is the universe’s second future. A mirror world emerging from the same moment of birth as ours.

A figure from the paper by Barbour et al. shows the points condensed together in the middle before their “Big Bang”, then going on to expand in either direction. An observer could only be on one side of the center so that observers in the right half, for example, would never know that there was a mirror world which existed in the left half. Image by APS/Alan Stonebraker.

The simulation, however, doesn’t incorporate quantum mechanics or relativity into the model. Its simplicity is both what makes it so appealing and what brings into question how accurate it could be. We may see two universes blossoming from the central state in the simulation, but does that mean it’s something that’s happened in the real world?

The idea of a mirrorverse really began in the1950’s with the surprising results of the Wu experiment.

Physics has three kinds of symmetries. Reflection, rotation, and translation. The symmetry of reflection is also known as parity and comes in either left or right-handedness. Of the four fundamental forces of nature — electromagnetism, gravity, the strong nuclear force, and the weak nuclear force — only the weak nuclear force shows a break in parity. When particles interact at the quantum mechanical scale their interactions are more often left-handed so that the universe we live in has an overall preference for left-handedness. We are missing left-right symmetry.

This is similar to the problem of the arrow of time. We experience something in this universe which has no reason to be there. Just as there is no reason why time must move forward, there is no reason left-handedness would prevail over right-handedness. So to explain the break in parity the idea of the mirror world came into play.

It’s a straightforward solution. If there exists a mirror world just out of reach from ours, that universe would experience a preference for right-handedness and there would again be a balance to the bigger picture. The matter of this world is known as mirror matter. The mirror particles would be identical to ours — with identical forces — but would interact with our world only in the weakest and most fleeting way. Mirror matter would even produce light, but any interaction between the matter of that world and this world would be extremely difficult to detect. Over the years mirror matter has been brought up as a possible explanation for that all-too-present and yet ambiguous ghost we call dark matter.

We know dark matter exists because of its gravitational effects. The lensing seen here shows how dark matter manipulates light from distant galaxies. Distorted images of the same galaxy in red and the same quasar in blue are shown. Image by NASA and ESA.

Some scientists believe the slippery, finicky mirror matter is dark matter. We have such a difficult time understanding dark matter because the great bulk of it is hidden away in the mirror world where it manifests for our telescopes only by way of gravity. If this is true, it would mean the mirror world is 5 times larger than ours since there is 5 times as much dark matter as there is regular matter. Their cosmos would be not only elusive, but palatial.

Yet the most fascinating mystery pointing to a mirror world is that of neutron decay.

Neutrons are part of atomic nuclei. When they’re taken out of atomic nuclei these neutrons decay into protons, electrons, and antineutrinos. Since all neutrons are the same, they should all decay in the same way and in the same timespan. This is where the mystery comes in.

There were two experimental setups. The first was to see how long a beam of neutrons took to decay. This gave scientists a time of 14 mins and 48 seconds. The second setup involved placing the neutrons in a scientific bottle, resulting in a decay time of 14 mins and 38 seconds. A difference of 10 seconds. There was no reason for there to be any difference at all between how one neutron decayed versus another. No matter the setting, all neutrons should have become protons in the same amount of time.

It’s important to have a precise measurement of the neutron’s lifespan. Not only is the difference bewildering, neutron decay is also related to the amount of hydrogen and helium available after the Big Bang. It’s a factor in understanding the universe’s past. And its farthest future. Above, a neutron decays into three particles. Image by Evan Berkowitz.

At first this was attributed to experimental error. There were any number of parameters that could have been wrong. Neutron beam intensity and the efficiency of the detector are just two. But the test has been repeated throughout the years, each time with refined tools and refined methods of observation. One of the most accurate measurements ever taken still showed around a 9 second difference between the beam and bottle neutron decays. If there is such a land as the mirrorverse, it could affect our observations of neutron decay by absorbing some of the particles from our world. Neutrons in the bottle experiment, for instance, would cross into the mirror world and become mirror matter. Because they are no longer detectable in our world it would then influence what we consider to be the neutron decay time.

The mirror realm would be an answer to many of our modern mysteries. It’s not a land where mirror versions of ourselves would be living mirrored lives, sleeping in copies of our houses and with copies of our family. Instead the mirrorverse is a sibling to our world. The reflected particles perhaps form homey large-scale structures. These planets and stars abide by a backwards notion of time, pinned to the sky of a spacious universe cut off from ours.

Our world, distorted. Under the microscope the particles of that world would even look like particles of Earth. And that is why the mirrorverse is haunting — we might be seeing traces of it bleeding into our cosmos, inexplicable by any normal means. Yet it remains unwilling to completely show itself or be touched by us. It lingers out there. Ghostly and familiar, close and yet impenetrable.

Contributor

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: High-altitude platform stations (HAPS) are emerging as a new frontier in communications technology, offering a unique blend of accessibility and affordability. Positioned between 4 and 30 miles above Earth, these stations bring telecommunications equipment closer to the surface than satellites, resulting in stronger, higher-capacity signals. Researchers have demonstrated that HAPS could provide high-speed […]
Key Takeaway: Horse domestication remains a mystery, despite its significant impact on human civilization. The Indo-European or “Kurgan hypothesis” suggests that horse domestication began on the steppes of western Asia, specifically among the Yamnaya people. However, recent advances in technology have revealed that the horses from the Botai culture were not the ancestors of today’s […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: Quantum tunnelling, a phenomenon from quantum mechanics, has been applied to artificial intelligence (AI) to create a neural network that mimics human perception of optical illusions. This neural network, trained to recognize optical illusions like the Necker cube and Rubin’s vase, exhibits a state of ambiguity, mirroring human ambiguity in perception. This finding […]
Key Takeaway: The British cycling team’s 2008 Beijing Olympics victory was a result of a simple strategy: the pursuit of marginal gains. The team’s coach, Sir Dave Brailsford, believed that success could be achieved by making a series of 1% improvements across every aspect of the cyclists’ gear, stamina, and physical conditioning. This principle, known […]
Key Takeaway: Wine is a popular choice for many cultures, but its value is subjective and influenced by personal taste. Wine reviews, such as the 100-point scale, are rated based on quality relative to similar grape varieties and regions. However, the integrity of these reviews is debated, with some arguing that financial arrangements can influence […]
Key Takeaway: A study examining an ancient underwater avalanche off the coast of Morocco has challenged our understanding of these powerful events and their potential to disrupt global communications and infrastructure. These avalanches, also known as turbidity currents, are difficult to observe and measure, but their impact is undeniable, particularly on the intricate web of […]
Key Takeaway: State intervention in global economics is gaining momentum, particularly since the 2010s, due to financial crises, geopolitical tensions, and the fragility of global supply chains. The relationship between exports and protectionism is complex, as successful industrial and trade policies often blend export promotion with elements of protectionism. South Korea and Taiwan have used […]

Trending

I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Institute’s new report, “Reskilling China: Transforming The World’s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learners”, which focuses on the country’s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.

Login

Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics