Key Takeaway:


Peter Higgs, who gave his name to the subatomic particle known as the Higgs boson,ย has died aged 94. He was always a modest man, especially when considering that he was one of the greats of particle physics โ€“ the area of science concerned with the building blocks of matter.ย 

In 1964, a few years after arriving from London to take up a position at the University of Edinburgh, Higgs read a paper by the American theoretical physicist Philip Anderson. At the time, physicists did not have a theory for how subatomic particles got their mass. (Mass can be described as the total amount of matter in an object, while weight is the force of gravity acting on an object.)

Andersonโ€™s paper showed that particles can have mass. When a system in physics โ€“ such as two different subatomic particles โ€“ becomes changed, physicists sometimes describe it as having โ€œbroken symmetryโ€. This can lead to the emergence of new properties.

During a walk in the Scottish Highlands, Higgs had the idea of a lifetime. He figured out exactly how to apply theย symmetry breakingย he had read about in Andersonโ€™s paper to an important group of particles calledย gauge bosons. It would lead to an explanation for how the building blocks of matter acquire their mass.

Two other groups of physicists had the same idea at around the same time: Robert Brout and Franรงois Englert in Brussels, and Carl Hagen, Gerald Guralnik and Tom Kibble at Imperial College London. 

An afterthought

The key distinguishing feature of Higgsโ€™s contribution was that, as an afterthought, he predicted the existence of a new massive particle left over from the process he had worked out in the Highlands. This particle would later bear his name: the Higgs boson.

I believe it was always a bit of an embarrassment to Higgs that this symmetry-breaking mechanism was sometimes shortened to the โ€œHiggs mechanismโ€. He was always quick to point out everyone elseโ€™s contribution and preferred the term: โ€œAnderson-Brout-Englert-Higgs-Hagen-Guralnik-Kibble mechanismโ€.

Peter Higgs.
Higgs giving a speech at the Nobel gala banquet in 2013. Henrik Montgomery

Over the next few decades, it became clear how important the contribution of these scientists to our understanding of particle physics was โ€“ not least because the particle named after Higgs turned out to be so elusive. Several machines, called particle colliders, were built to probe the limits of our knowledge in physics. 

They explored and tested the most widely accepted theory to explain how fundamental particles (those which cannot be broken down into any other particles) and forces interact: the Standard Model. And the Standard Model proved to hold in almost all conditions. The only missing ingredient, which had not yet been discovered by a particle collider, was the massive particle predicted by Higgs.

The frustration at how elusive the Higgs boson was proving prompted Nobel prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman to give it yet another moniker: the โ€œGoddamn Particleโ€. This was subsequently shortened to the โ€œGod Particleโ€

It would take 48 years and the largest machine ever made, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), to finally find evidence that Higgs and his colleagues had been correct. Cern, the organisation which operates the LHC, announced that physicists had almost certainly discovered the particle on July 4 2012. 

Further experiments confirmed this was indeed the particle predicted by Higgs. Yet when it was time for the Nobel prize in physics to be announced in October 2013, Higgs went out for a walk instead of staying by the telephone.

Atlas experiment.
It took the largest machine on Earth, the LHC, to discover the Higgs boson. Laurent Gillieron/EPA

A โ€˜fifth forceโ€™ of nature

It is now more than ten years since the discovery of the Higgs boson. There is a big difference between just having a theory that (almost) everyone believes in, and finally having the evidence that it is, in fact, a good description of nature. 

Indeed, Iโ€™m not sure if we fully understand yet what Higgs and his colleagues have given the world. It amounts to the discovery of a new interaction between particles that we had not seen before, called Yukawa coupling. This is essentially a โ€œfifth forceโ€ of nature to complement the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the strong nuclear force and the weak nuclear force.

There are many other questions to resolve, however. Only 4% of the universe is made up of the matter that we can see. The rest is dark matter and dark energy โ€“ but we do not understand the nature of either. Thereโ€™s even a theoretical calculation that the Higgs boson is crucial for the stability of the universe.

The Cern Council has just reviewed the progress of a feasibility study to build a machine called the Future Circular Collider, which will succeed the LHC and will aim to answer many outstanding questions about the nature of the universe, if approved. I for one know where I want to look for answers in the colliderโ€™s data: the Higgs boson.

Contributor

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: Recent research has focused on replicating the chemical reactions that constitute life as we know it in conditions plausible for early Earth around 4 billion years ago. However, the rise of experimental work has led to many contradictory theories. Some scientists believe that life emerged in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, where the conditions provided […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Anxious Generation, calls for action to limit teenagers’ smartphone access and address the mental health crisis caused by the widespread use of smartphones. Haidt cites the “great rewiring” period from 2010 to 2015 as a time when adolescents’ neural systems were primed for anxiety and depression by daily smartphone […]
Key Takeaway: Concerns about AI’s potential roguehood and potential harm to privacy and dignity are a significant concern. AI’s algorithms, programmed by humans, are also biased and discriminatory. However, a psychologist’s research suggests that AI is a threat to making people less disciplined and skilled in making thoughtful decisions. Making thoughtful decisions involves understanding the […]
Key Takeaway: A study published in the Journal of Personality suggests that long-term single people can be secure and thriving, possibly due to their attachment style. The research found that 78% of singles were insecure, with 22% being secure. Secure singles are comfortable with intimacy and closeness in relationships, while anxious singles worry about rejection […]
Key Takeaway: A project involving archaeologists, astronomers, and photographers from English Heritage, Oxford, Leicester, and Bournemouth universities, as well as the Royal Astronomical Society, aims to study the lunar alignment at Stonehenge. The project aims to identify the layout of certain stones and the major lunar standstill, which occurs when the northernmost and southernmost moonrises […]

Trending

I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Instituteโ€™s new report, โ€œReskilling China: Transforming The Worldโ€™s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learnersโ€, which focuses on the countryโ€™s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.

Login

Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics