Key Takeaway:

Horse racing is a spectacle where horses race to win a race. From a horse’s perspective, winning a race has few intrinsic rewards. While being first to reach the finishing post is important for the horse’s human connections, there is little direct benefit to motivate it to voluntarily gallop faster. Horses are social animals and synchronize their movement with other horses in their group. However, winning in a race is not what owners, trainers, and punters want from horses. Horse races depend on two factors: the horse’s innate tendency to synchronize with other horses and its ability to be trained to ignore these tendencies in response to cues from the jockey. However, winning horses likely have no concept of being in a race, and their success is likely due to a combination of natural ability, physical fitness, and jockey skill.


When racing season arrives, everyone becomes an expert on the horses that are the stars of the spectacle.ย 

TV personalities, professional pundits and form guides talk confidently about the favouriteโ€™s โ€œwill to winโ€. In close races, the equine contestants โ€œbattle it outโ€, demonstrating โ€œheartโ€, โ€œgritโ€ and โ€œdeterminationโ€. 

But do horses even know they are in a race, let alone have a desire to win it? Do they understand what it means when their nose is the first one to pass the post?

Based on decades of experience and everything we know about horse behaviour, I think the most plausible answer is โ€œnoโ€.ย 

From the horseโ€™s perspective

From a horseโ€™s perspective, there are few intrinsic rewards for winning a race. 

Reaching the end might mean relief from the pressure to keep galloping at high speed and hits from the jockeyโ€™s whip, but the same is true for all the horses once they pass the finishing post. If the race is close, the horse that eventually wins might even be whipped more often in the final stages than horses further back in the field.

So while being first to reach the winning post can be crucially important to the horseโ€™s human connections, there is very little direct, intrinsic benefit to the horse that would motivate it to voluntarily gallop faster to achieve this outcome.

So does a horse even know itโ€™s in a race? Again, the answer is likely โ€œnoโ€. 

Running (cantering or galloping) is a quintessential horse behaviour and horses voluntarily run together in groups when given the opportunity โ€“ even in races without jockeys. However, there are a number of reasons to think horses have not evolved a desire to โ€œwinโ€ during a group gallop.

Horses are social animals. In the wild, to minimise their individual exposure to predators, they synchronise their movement with other horses in their group.

This synchronisation includes maintaining similar speeds to other group members (to keep the group together), being alert to the positions of their own body and their neighboursโ€™ to avoid collisions, and adapting their speed to the terrain and environmental cues that indicate upcoming danger or obstacles. In the wild, โ€œwinningโ€ โ€“ that is, arriving first, long before other group members โ€“ could even be a negative, exposing the โ€œwinnerโ€ to an increased risk of predation. 

This collective behaviour is the opposite of what owners, trainers and punters want from horses during a race. 

The horseโ€™s preferences (and how riders override them)

Horse races depend on two horse-related factors: the horseโ€™s innate tendency to synchronise with other horses, and its ability to be trained to ignore these tendencies in response to cues from the jockey during a race. 

Trainers and jockeys also harness the preferences of individual horses. Some horses are averse to bunching up with others during the race, so jockeys let them move to the front of the field (these are โ€œfront runnersโ€). Other horses seek the security of the group, so jockeys let them remain in the bunch until closer to the winning post (these are โ€œcome-from-behindโ€ winners). 

Jockeys use several different interventions to override the horseโ€™s innate tendency to synchronise. These might include: 

  • directing the horses to travel much closer to the other horses (risking the sometimes fatal injuries we sometimes see at the track)
  • travelling at speeds not of the horseโ€™s choosing (usually at far higher speeds and for longer durations, and often maintained by use of the whip) 
  • preventing the horse from changing course to adapt its position relative to other horses in the field (directing its path via pressure on the mouth from the bit or taps from the whip). 

During the early stages of a race, jockeys rely on horsesโ€™ innate desire to remain with the group to ensure they maintain the physical effort required to keep in touch with the front runners. This tendency may then be overruled so the horse will act independently of the group, leave it behind and come to the front to hopefully win. 

No concept of being in a race

So horses most likely have no concept of being in a โ€œraceโ€, where the goal of their galloping is to get to a certain location on the track before any of the other horses. However, they undoubtedly know what itโ€™s like to be in a race. That is, they learn through prior experience and training what is likely to happen and what to do during a race. 

And with jockeys and trainers who understand the individual preferences of their horses to maximise their chances during the race, there will always be one horse that reaches that part of the track designated the winning post before the other horses in the group. 

But as for winning horses understanding they are there to โ€œwinโ€? Itโ€™s far more likely it is the combination of natural ability, physical fitness and jockey skill that accounts for which horse wins, rather than any innate desire by that horse to get to the winning post before the other horses.

Contributor

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Anxious Generation, calls for action to limit teenagers’ smartphone access and address the mental health crisis caused by the widespread use of smartphones. Haidt cites the “great rewiring” period from 2010 to 2015 as a time when adolescents’ neural systems were primed for anxiety and depression by daily smartphone […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: A study has found that humble leaders can become more promotable by growing others through a “humility route”. Human capital theory suggests that employees’ value can be enhanced by investing in their knowledge, skills, and abilities. Humble leaders focus on the learning and growth of their followers, creating human capital value for themselves. […]
Key Takeaway: Leading scientists and technologists often make terrible predictions about the direction of innovation, leading to misalignments between a company’s economic incentives to profit from its proprietary AI model and society’s interests in how the AI model should be monetised and deployed. Focusing on the economic risks from AI is not just about preventing […]

Trending

I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Instituteโ€™s new report, โ€œReskilling China: Transforming The Worldโ€™s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learnersโ€, which focuses on the countryโ€™s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.

Login

Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics