How many followers is good enough?

Everyone wants more followers in social media. Businesses, too. At the same time, marketing experts are shouting at the top of their lungs that the actual number of followers doesn’t really matter; it’s all about having the right followers. And this is all accompanied by anxious whispers in the office hallways about who has bought their followers and who hasn’t.

Does your number of followers matter?

Quality Trumps Quantity

The number of followers doesn’t really matter — to a certain degree.

You could have 100,000 fake followers on Twitter and it wouldn’t matter if your statistics tells you that 5,000 saw your last tweet because they were all bots anyway. Or, you could have 16,000 followers like I do, but I’m not as active there as I once was, which the algorithm doesn’t like. As a contrast, I have half my Twitter volume of followers on Instagram, where I am active at the moment, but thousands of percent more engagement. The actual number of followers matter very little.

In fact, having too many followers can be a problem if your brand looses its momentum. If you get 100 Facebook likes per week on average, then it’s better to have 50 fans (200% engagement) than 5,000 (2% engagement).

So, all those marketing experts aren’t wrong per se. But there’s still something to be said about simply having too few followers as a business.

Return on Engagement

If a business hires one person to run all of its social channels and this person cost 2,000€ per week in total (including taxes, rental fees, content- and software licensing etc.) — how many followers must this employee engage each week to go break even?

There are many ways to attribute value to social media marketing and the right choice depends on the business itself. You could attribute value to certain behaviours; a popular path is to calculate average value per generated lead. E-commerce vendors can often connect their online marketing efforts to online sales quite easily. The most common approach is to calculate the alternative cost for the brand’s organic reach. How much would it cost to reach all those people with advertising? This is in many ways an outdated (and hated) model, but that’s beside the point for this blog post; the point is that there are better or worse ways to attribute value to your online marketing efforts — but it’s something that most businesses have to do.

If you have to reach 100,000 people to convert customers to a value of 2,000€ per week, then it actually matters how many fans you actually have at the beginning of that week.

Critical Mass

A brand’s total average organic reach tends to be surprisingly stable week after week. Social network algorithms change, but usually not that fast. Engagement rates tend to fluctuate with content quality and competition, but usually not that much. Social follower volumes tend to go up in most cases, but usually not that much. Conversion rates varies with traffic quality and UIX, but usually not that much.

In these scenarios, it matters whether you start off the week with a big enough bulk of social media followers or not. You can (and probably should) pay for some of your weekly reach, but every cent must be earned back into your business — with interest! — sooner or later.

This allows us to approximate a specific number of followers you need to go break even financially. This number of followers is what is referred to as critical mass. If we assume that conversion rates and follower reach ratios to stay reasonable stable, we can approximate how many followers a brand needs to go break even.

Conversions needed to hit break even / the average follower reach ratio = your brand’s critical mass of followers

For me, I’ve estimated that I need one quality lead every three weeks to healthily sustain my freelance business. To get this from blogging, tweeting, and gramming alone, I need to start every week with a weekly base of 15,000 followers — out of which about 8% will see at least one of my updates. Hence, 15,000 social media followers1 is the critical mass to start the week for my freelance business.

Approximating your brand’s critical mass in social media is no exact science — and it’s no guarantee. But there’s a much deeper, and much more business critical, point to be made about a brand’s critical mass in social media.

Strategies Before and After

Almost every brand who start out in social media will be loosing money. This is simply because their social accounts haven’t yet reached critical mass. This leads us to the following key insights:

It’s important to invest in aggressive social media strategies to quickly reach critical mass. Regular organic growth might not even get close, ever.

Key stakeholders must be made aware of the critical mass challenge. They must get a chance to understand how investments in this space scales.

If you acquire the wrong type of followers, your conversion rates will go down, and you’ll be forced to acquire even more followers. There’s no cheating the system.

Typically when you reach critical mass, the brand’s aggressive investments must cool off. Now you should focus on engagement quality instead of growth.

critical mass | Social Media Strategy | 2
Until the brand reaches critical mass for organic reach, paid media strategies will perform better.

About the Author

This article was written by Jerry Silfwer is an awarded freelance consultant specialising in digital strategy and public relations. Based in Stockholm, Sweden. See more.

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: Intelligence is a crucial factor in determining one’s wealth, as it contributes to economic and professional success. It is the best predictor of both educational achievement and work performance, and academic and professional success are a fairly good forecaster of income. However, not all highly intelligent people are primarily driven by a desire […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: China’s national champions for semiconductor design and manufacturing, HiSilicon and Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (SMIC), are making waves in Washington. Huawei’s launch of the Huawei Mate 60 smartphone in August 2023 showed that Chinese self-sufficiency in HiSilicon’s semiconductor design and SMIC’s manufacturing capabilities were catching up at an alarming pace. The US has […]
Key Takeaway: Tech industry leaders are discussing the convergence between humans and machines, inspired by transhumanism. Elon Musk’s company Neuralink aims to facilitate this convergence, aiming to prevent humans from being left behind in technology advancements. Transhumanists advocate for the three “supers” of superintelligence, superlongevity, and superhappiness. Companies like OpenAI, DeepMind, and Anthropic are racing […]
Key Takeaway: Racial and gender bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and language models has been a concern in social robots, which are designed to interact with diverse groups of people. Socially assistive robotics aims to create machines that will help people help themselves, but these robots often do not reflect basic aspects of society’s diversity. […]
Key Takeaway: 13-year-old Willis Gibson became the first human to beat the original Nintendo version of Tetris, dedicating his win to his father. Most gamers are not lazy or mindless, with memorable achievements ranging from heroic to bizarre. Speedrunning, a popular gaming subculture, involves players optimizing routes and exploiting glitches to complete games in minutes. […]


I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Institute’s new report, “Reskilling China: Transforming The World’s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learners”, which focuses on the country’s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.


Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics