Three years since TikTok was launched, the video-sharing social network grown rapidly to accumulate more than two billion downloads, one of the most popular apps of the moment, beating even Instagram or YouTube in consumption time in the United States, United Kingdom or Spain, particularly among younger age segments. 

TikTok might be described as a repository of canned content to be conveniently remixed with user-created videos, a viral meme generating machine that makes users feel like rock stars, and has even been used as a way to coordinate protests against Donald Trump by sinking his COVID-19 comeback rally last week in Tulsa, as well as launching denial of inventory attacks on the US president’s merchandising site. 

And of course if you dare to criticize TikTok, you’ll simply be told that you’re too old to understand it, that young people have different criteria to yours. Which is all well and good, but what is TikTok? How reliable are the criteria of young people? 

TikTok’s story is like many others on the web: an app to ​​record short music videos using simple editing tools and offering all kinds of incentives and competition goes viral and is downloaded in record numbers in several countries, becoming the most valuable startup in the world, ahead of Uber.

Along the way, an acquisition and consolidation, a lot of expectation, from competing in some areas with the all-powerful WeChat super-app to becoming, according to some, the future of the music industry.

So far, so good. Any problem? Well, there is the small matter that many TikTok users are girls, 13 or less who record themselves dancing and lip syncing to their favorite songs, often trying to be the most provocative or daring. Sure, data is hard to find: these apps publish very little data on their demographics and the under-13 segment tends to lie when they register or don’t even have their own profile in the app stores or use devices in their parent or siblings’ name. But in the case of TikTok all you have to do is look at many of its videos. Now, if you put a whole bunch of videos of pubescent girls dancing to their favorite music on a social network with recommendation tools, it’s going to become a magnet for sexual predators who are likely to try to contact them through the app’s chat feature; what’s more, it even helps users find videos of a certain type.

The authorities have finally reacted: the FTC has already fined TikTok $5.7 million for storing profiles and personal information of children aged under thirteen without their parents’ consent, as well making those profiles public and even for allowing, until October 2016 to share their location. What could possibly go wrong? Now the UK authorities have begun to investigate TikTok for the same reasons. The app has already been banned in Indonesia and India

Right after being fined by the FTC, the company published a note and updated the app with an age gate: all users will need to verify their age, and the under 13-year-olds will then be directed to a separate, more restricted in-app experience that protects their personal information and prevents them from publishing videos to the platform. Guess what’s going to happen when kids realize that the app does not allow them to publish their videos? Easy as one, two, three: they will simply lie about their age. 

TikTok, or its Chinese parent company, ByteDance, probably isn’t worried about this or even about the fines: it makes vast amounts of money from purchases made on the app of the emojis users share on the videos of other users.

What are parents supposed to do? Force their children to uninstall TikTok from their smartphones? In all honesty, I think that’s going too far. It’s important to be aware of the possible risks involved with these kinds of apps, but even more important is the need to educate our children about responsibility and these new communication tools, about the need to ​respond rapidly to any kind of unwanted communication and to report anything that could constitute a criminal offense.

When it comes to our children, safety is the watchword, but trying to lock them away from the world will only make them more curious about what’s out there: instead, we must treat the internet and social networks in the same way we do other potential risks, in an even-handed way. At the same time, we have the right to expect the owners of the platforms our children use to be responsible for any possible misuses, which in some cases, they encourage.

Since then, the US armed forces have forbidden personnel from using it and describes it as a threat to cybersecurity. Israeli cybersecurity company Check Point has investigated it and concludes it has backdoors and major vulnerabilities, as well as overall security issues. The US government is also investigating it. Meanwhile, Reddit CEO and co-founder Steve Huffmandescribes it as a “fundamentally parasitic app that is always listening” and warns against installing what he calls “spyware”. Several child advocacy groups say it poses a clear risk to children. Apple claims it has caught TikTok using clipboard capture mechanisms to spy on millions of users

Other investigations reveal that its content censorship standards are decided by the Chinese government and are clearly discriminatory. A cybersecurity expert who has reverse engineered the app warns people to stay away from it. In short, it’s not hard to find evidence of the problematic nature of TikTok. And yet it thrives, a time bomb in the making

Why are so many people and institutions attacking a seemingly innocent app? Are we critics just a bunch of out of touch old fogeys? 

I don’t believe so: as I said a year ago, TikTok is a lesson in irresponsibility, dangerous by design. And not simply by carelessness, mistake or default: this is a deep and patent irresponsibility, a philosophy focused on the constant capture of all kinds of user data. In short, not recommendable for children or adults, particularly thanks to its sinister and addictive content recommendation system. And now under the benevolent guise of a Western CEO formerly at Disney

All tools can be adapted to almost any use. Many young and not-so-young people who use TikTok today consider it fun, a fad, a way of expressing themselves, or even a vehicle for activism. But it’s not that, or at least it’s not just that. It’s the application of a philosophy on the internet — we want to see everything, know everything, analyze everything without limits. It’s taken many years to recognize Facebook for what it is and to try to bring it into line through boycotts: we should act now to limit TikTok and any malevolent activities. 

Have no illusions: beneath its seemingly innocent exterior, TikTok at this stage could be very well pose a public danger. If you know nothing about cybersecurity, trust the number of analysts who have been saying it for a while. Or ask the Indian Government.

About the Author

This article was written by Enrique Dans, professor of Innovation at IE Business School and blogger at

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: Conspiracy theories are prevalent and can involve various factors. People believe false conspiracy theories for various reasons, such as the existence of real conspiracies. However, unfounded conspiracy theories often lack evidence and substitute elements that should be red flags for skeptics. To vet a claim, one should seek out evidence, test the allegation, […]
Key Takeaway: Recent research has focused on replicating the chemical reactions that constitute life as we know it in conditions plausible for early Earth around 4 billion years ago. However, the rise of experimental work has led to many contradictory theories. Some scientists believe that life emerged in deep-sea hydrothermal vents, where the conditions provided […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: NASA’s Curiosity and Perseverance rover missions are investigating the planet’s evidence for life, known as its “biosignatures,” in unprecedented detail. The rovers are acting as extraterrestrial detectives, hunting for clues that life may have existed eons ago, including evidence of long-gone liquid surface water, life-sustaining minerals, and organic molecules. The Mars of today […]
Key Takeaway: Jonathan Haidt’s book, The Anxious Generation, calls for action to limit teenagers’ smartphone access and address the mental health crisis caused by the widespread use of smartphones. Haidt cites the “great rewiring” period from 2010 to 2015 as a time when adolescents’ neural systems were primed for anxiety and depression by daily smartphone […]
Key Takeaway: Concerns about AI’s potential roguehood and potential harm to privacy and dignity are a significant concern. AI’s algorithms, programmed by humans, are also biased and discriminatory. However, a psychologist’s research suggests that AI is a threat to making people less disciplined and skilled in making thoughtful decisions. Making thoughtful decisions involves understanding the […]
Key Takeaway: A study published in the Journal of Personality suggests that long-term single people can be secure and thriving, possibly due to their attachment style. The research found that 78% of singles were insecure, with 22% being secure. Secure singles are comfortable with intimacy and closeness in relationships, while anxious singles worry about rejection […]


I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Institute’s new report, “Reskilling China: Transforming The World’s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learners”, which focuses on the country’s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.


Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics