I believe that Shawn Murphy is right. Employees who are engaged in their work, are satisfied, have a sense of wellbeing, have purpose, feel they are doing meaningful work, and have a belief they can be successful in their jobs, are more likely to achieve positive business outcomes than employees who are unhappy in their work. The problem is that there doesn’t appear to be evidence to back up this assertion.

All of the well-publicized research on this relationship is correlational and, therefore, we don’t know which is causing which or if other factors (such as leadership, organizational structure, R&D, etc.) are more important than employee happiness. In an opinion piece for the NY Times titled, Why You Hate Work, the authors report results from an employee survey they did with the help of Harvard Business Review. The authors observe:

Engagement — variously defined as “involvement, commitment, passion, enthusiasm, focused effort and energy” — has now been widely correlated with higher corporate performance.  

A 2012 global survey by Towers Watson found a high correlation between “happy” employees and a company’s profitability. Gallup does a survey of companies every few years and consistently reports a …well-established connection between employee engagement and nine performance outcomes: 

  1. customer rating
  2. profitability
  3. productivity 
  4. turnover (for high-turnover and low-turnover organizations)
  5. safety incidents
  6. shrinkage (theft)
  7. absenteeism
  8. patient safety incidents
  9. quality (defects)

These are impressive studies that suggest but do not confirm a causal link. A highly plausible alternative explanation is that doing well on some or all of these performance outcomes causes (or, at least, contributes to) employee engagement and happiness. Like me, I’m sure you know companies that have been productive and profitable while having a high-turnover workforce that is quite unhappy with work conditions. Or you know companies that have what appear to be wonderful work conditions but have failed to be profitable and sustainable.

Let me be clear. It’s logical that high engagement, what Rich Sheridan calls “joy”, helps companies achieve success. Some company stories would seem to support this conclusion. However, at this point, that is a hypothesis that has not been proven.

If you have evidence to the contrary, please let me know in a comment below.

Written by Stephen J. Gill of TypePad

Recently Published

Key Takeaway: A study has found that humble leaders can become more promotable by growing others through a “humility route”. Human capital theory suggests that employees’ value can be enhanced by investing in their knowledge, skills, and abilities. Humble leaders focus on the learning and growth of their followers, creating human capital value for themselves. […]

Top Picks

Key Takeaway: The current economic climate is particularly concerning for young people, who are often financially worse off than their parents. To overcome this, it is important to understand one’s financial attachment style, which can be secure, anxious, or avoidant. Attachment theory, influenced by childhood experiences and education, can help shape one’s relationship with money. […]
Key Takeaway: Wellness culture, which claims to provide happiness and meaning, has been criticized for its superficial focus on superficial aspects like candles and juice cleanses. Psychological research suggests that long-term wellbeing comes from a committed pursuit of both pleasure and meaning. Martin Seligman’s Perma model, which breaks wellbeing into five pillars: positive emotions, engagement, […]
Key Takeaway: Quantum computing, which uses entanglement to represent information, has the potential to revolutionize everyday life. However, the development of quantum computers has been slow due to the need to demonstrate an advantage over classical computers. Only a few notable quantum algorithms have been developed, such as the BB84 protocol and Shor’s algorithm, which […]
Key Takeaway: China’s leaders have declared a GDP growth target of 5% in 2024, despite facing economic problems and a property crisis. The country’s rapid economic growth has been attributed to market incentives, cheap labor, infrastructure investment, exports, and foreign direct investment. However, none of these drivers are working effectively. The government’s determination to deflate […]

Trending

I highly recommend reading the McKinsey Global Institute’s new report, “Reskilling China: Transforming The World’s Largest Workforce Into Lifelong Learners”, which focuses on the country’s biggest employment challenge, re-training its workforce and the adoption of practices such as lifelong learning to address the growing digital transformation of its productive fabric. How to transform the country […]

Join our Newsletter

Get our monthly recap with the latest news, articles and resources.

Login

Welcome to Empirics

We are glad you have decided to join our mission of gathering the collective knowledge of Asia!
Join Empirics